Monday, October 06, 2014
Wednesday, March 12, 2014
Idea Book (1965)
Posted by
Sleestak
at
3/12/2014 06:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: 1965, advertising, From the Collection
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Thanksgiving: Day 28
Is avoiding the squabbling, poop-stirring, bitter, baby-talking adults, downer experience of family worth the health risk of sneaking something sugary so I can feel sick and leave early without being rude?
YES.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
11/28/2013 06:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, atom age, Thanksgiving, Thanksgiving 2013
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Thanksgiving: Day 12
Posted by
Sleestak
at
11/12/2013 07:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, Thanksgiving, Thanksgiving 2013
Saturday, November 09, 2013
Thanksgiving: Day 9
Posted by
Sleestak
at
11/09/2013 09:05:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, racism, Thanksgiving, Thanksgiving 2013
Monday, October 21, 2013
Halloween: Day 21
Posted by
Sleestak
at
10/21/2013 02:00:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, graphic design, Halloween, Halloween 2013, Watusi
Friday, May 24, 2013
No Jelly
Posted by
Sleestak
at
5/24/2013 06:00:00 AM
3
comments
Labels: 1972, advertisement, advertising, candy, coupon, graphic design, roger hane
Friday, April 12, 2013
Guilty of Love in the First Degree
From Famous Fantastic Mysteries (August 1942).
Posted by
Sleestak
at
4/12/2013 06:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, pulp art
Thursday, January 26, 2012
A failure to communicate
I've used Discount Tires for my vehicle needs for years. Like most people I first became familiar with their company through their classic, hilarious and highly-effective commercial touting their return and replacement policy. Their service and price is why I began going to them when I started to drive.
But I'm going to have to think pretty hard about going in again any time soon. A few weeks ago I went to my usual location to get a new tire, which was worn. When I went in I told the salesperson what I needed and why and let them know that was all I was purchasing that day. Getting only one tire at a time is a young man's gamble. When you change one tire you should change all of them so they all wear evenly, everything balances right and you have no surprises a week later when an old tire fails. But I had been out sick from work for a few months and cash was tight. So I made myself clear about my needs that day
Apparently, through no fault of the employees I'm sure since they are very likely pressured to make sales from upper management, my desires as a customer where pushed aside. Before I left I received no less than six attempts to up-sell my purchase. Quoting a price, then lowering it, adding services and then discounted incentives (still adding up to more than I told them I would spend). Between my last visit to Discount Tires and this one it was like I had visited two different companies. At least at least on the front end experience. The exception being the swiftness and quality of their labor service in replacing the tire which remained great and if anything was better than before.
I
understand the hard up-sell. The economy has been in the dumps for years and companies are desperate for every nickle and dime from their brick and mortar outlets as they can be (while still somehow being able to afford using private jets to fly to meetings to exotic vacation resorts). My current employer tried the hard-sells at every opportunity until they realized the customer backlash wasn't worth it and dropped the requirement for most departments. When a customer says no that should be the end of it. No guilt trips, no acting like I just duct-taped loaded guns with filed down sears to the heads of the passengers of my car, no miming like Pontius Pilate washing his hands of the whole deal and so be it, the fiery deaths of my passengers is on my head.The pitches that the tire crew was giving me were presented in terms of my safety. I can appreciate that message. They pointed out the others tires were worn (Meh, not so much. All four were new less than a year ago. I wanted one changed because it kept getting scraped on a curb) and that I should change them and here's a great deal on 4 tires, etc., etc.
But the intent and sincerity perceived by the customer is important. If the pitch doesn't come off as sincere then I would think you are playing me for a sucker. The first tell that the clerk really was only saying what he had to was that he wouldn't look at me. Our last conversation before I left went like this:"Have we told you that you really should replace all those tires? They are getting worn."Sure, except you were looking everywhere but at me when you said all that. It doesn't mean he was a bad salesman, just that he was uncomfortable pushing another sales pitch on me. At least I hope that is what it was and he wasn't some predatory huckster. Also, one thing the clerk wasn't aware of: Their company's email message.
"Yes. Four times now in the last half an hour."
"Well, that shows you how important it is."
During the purchase the clerk asked for and I gave my email address. I didn't mind. This is important because that way I can receive tire recall notices, a handy and necessary service. So while seated in the lobby waiting for the tire to be replaced I did what anyone else would do: Browse the internet, check email and read some news. While waiting I got hit up again for more tires and shortly after received an email from Discount Tires thanking me for my purchase. I read it, knowing I needed to head off a barrage of emails and catalogs mailed to my house by changing my marketing preferences. It was after going to their website via the email and personalizing my visit I felt like was nothing more than a mark with a wallet.

In the image above there are several options for receiving messages from Discount Tires. This is an original, cropped screenshot with the only the customer name changed. In the initial view the message options default to sales pitches and one service reminder which would just be a sales pitch when you go in to the store. The two safety notices, really the most important part for the consumer and in the worst case scenario can mean life or death for a driver, is left unchecked by the company.
So this is the business plan? Hit me up for another sale but, in the case of the many who don't bother to sign up, or those that do but don't update their marketing preferences, not receive any notification that they might be driving on a faulty tire?
It wouldn't hurt to have the communication preferences default to choose all options, none of them or prioritize the safety notifications and then let the customer decide. Hold the sales pitches and default to caring about your customers a little bit more. The front end sales pitches and the way the customer notification service may be unrelated but it looks like it is a part of a narrowly focused top-down business strategy that prefers making a sale over any other consideration.
By the way, guys? Don't bother to contact me with offers or that "you are sorry I wasn't satisfied with my experience" or even as I know happens on occasion...threats. The tire service was great, the annoying hard up-sells were not. I know you won't change the front end sales pitches because if you did, let's be honest, sales would drop and that's the reality of business. In my experience few respond to those ads and instead search for the best deal they can through the internet going to their favored supplier first, based on their past experiences. Instead, just think about maybe changing the set up of those initial customer communication options.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
1/26/2012 06:00:00 AM
4
comments
Labels: advertising, customer service, fail
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
A delicious part of this complete lifestyle change
I don't mind the dietary changes that come with being diagnosed with diabetes. What is frying my eggs is the misleading, dissembling, fact-twisting and downright lies of most labeling, advertising and packaging of food stuffs that purport to be healthier and "low sugar" or "low sodium" when they contain the same or greater amounts of ingredients I am trying to avoid.
All the marketing that appeals to hippies, hipsters and the health-conscious is really a shameless scam that borders on criminal negligence. Reading between the lies, their products are not necessarily healthier but is a part of a managed diet of people weighing portions and counting ingredients. 700 mg of sodium in a serving of a "healthier, all-natural, low-sodium" bread compared to 500 mg of it per slice in a far less expensive, cheaply made, junk-food processed loaf doesn't seem too beneficial to me.
It really is caveat emptor when it comes to food.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
1/10/2012 11:30:00 PM
7
comments
Labels: advertising, diabetes
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Little thing, you have taught me only hygiene
Posted by
Sleestak
at
12/10/2011 11:41:00 PM
3
comments
Labels: advertising, alan moore, john totleben, rick vietch, spectre, swamp thing
Saturday, September 10, 2011
This Omnivore's Dilemma
I don't know whether to slather this stuff onto my feet or spread it on toast.
From a local San Diego Asian market 9-5-11.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
9/10/2011 04:05:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, Grocery Store Artifact, San Diego
Friday, August 05, 2011
Did you have to include the hair?
Posted by
Sleestak
at
8/05/2011 05:59:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, Art, Grocery Store Artifact, illustration
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Not Shown: Tears
Utterly hilarious in heavy-handed guilt inducement this online ad from a bank urges you to avoid years of expensive therapy for your children and acrimonious divorce from a spouse by taking out a loan for fancy, expensive vacations and not suffer the shame of a mediocre family trip to lesser destinations.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
7/28/2011 10:40:00 AM
2
comments
Labels: advertising
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Recursion by Monteil
Seeing this ad for Nostalgia perfume in my copy of the December 1962 issue of Cosmopolitan magazine made me wistful for the good old days and before I knew it I was stuck in a recursive nostalgia loop from which there was no escape.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
7/13/2011 06:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, Science
Friday, May 13, 2011
The Picture of Dora Gray
All the evil the young model perpetrates in her life is reflected in the images of her on billboards. Her physical body and face untouched, eternally youthful on the exterior but rotting and festering within.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
5/13/2011 10:56:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, dora gray, horror, provenance
Friday, May 06, 2011
As easy as trying on a new hat
This gimmick still exists today but in software form where an uploaded image is virtually merged with different styles of hair and clothing.
From Cowboy Love #31 (August 1955).
Posted by
Sleestak
at
5/06/2011 03:26:00 PM
1 comments
Labels: advertising, Comic Book Ad, fashion
Sunday, April 03, 2011
Vinylite plastic protects sleeping baby

I don't know what was worse; the parents that would have bought this product or the company that sold it.
From People Today (9-26-51).
Posted by
Sleestak
at
4/03/2011 06:12:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, baby, stupid
Wednesday, February 09, 2011
New and Improved
Wondered what the customers were giggling about (my first instinct was not to look up) until I looked at the cash register and saw that the product abbreviation for Creamy Supreme frosting had an unfortunate and comical result.
Real receipt with a false header because of humorless bosses.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
2/09/2011 06:00:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, fail, Grocery Store Artifact
Monday, February 07, 2011
Art is Food

My current dietary choices do not include chips and other snacks these days but I found this store branding of munchies clever and unique. The product is identified on the bag and draws attention by the cute doodles centered around a chip or cheese puff. As marketing goes it is a pretty nice effort and goes beyond what one usually sees for labeling for a generic store product.
There are several illustrations but my favorite is the potato chip mouse being threatened by a venomous snake.
Posted by
Sleestak
at
2/07/2011 02:00:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: advertising, Art, Grocery Store Artifact, illustration











